Obama Pods hate the First Amendment.

The Obama Pods are out in force hacking, disrupting and spamming Anti-BHO blogs.

Why?

Because free speech is the enemy of Barrack Hussein Obama and the pods know it. In all the comments on all the blogs I see from pods - NONE explain why Obama should be President.

None.

Either they attack Clinton, attack McCain or spew some drivel about the "party". This party they are talking about is not any party anyone recognizes anymore. It is Stalinist in spirit and deed - and will, no doubt, be in word in short order.
These people are dangerous, anti-American thugs.

100% Anti-Obama

I'm no longer just pro Senator Clinton. I am completely anti-Obama.

I want to thank his supporters out there - you crazy kids - for pushing me out of the party and helping me on my way to Independence.

Here's just a few reasons why:

The claim that anyone who won't vote for Obama is a racist.

The claim that anyone who won't vote for Obama is stupid. So stupid, in fact, despite record turn out in Florida the smart people stayed home because they knew their votes wouldn't count. So if we count Florida's results in total we are disenfranchising the brilliant people who disenfranchised themselves.

The claim that Michigan shouldn't get a full ride because Senator Obama (like his smart Florida supporters) disenfranchised himself by taking his name off the ballot and denying his supporters the opportunity to show their love. By the way, can I just say that again? HE TOOK HIS NAME OFF THE BALLOT. THERE WERE NO RULES THAT SAID HE HAD TO. WHY DIDN'T HE TAKE HIS NAME OFF FLORIDA'S BALLOT AS WELL?

The claim that the popular vote doesn't matter; it's all about super delegates. Hello? Were you just not alive in 2000? Did you never refer to President Bush as illegitimate because he lost the popular vote but won the because of the Supreme Court and the Electoral College?

Here's a new one I adore. Puerto Rico doesn't matter because they can't vote in the General. I actually went over to the dreaded Huffington Post last night - I showered immediatly - and the mocking of Puerto Rico and Puerto Ricans was over the top. Memo to the Obamanation: there are more Puerto Ricans living in the US than in Puerto Rico. Way to help your man get in with the Latinos!

Holding the Supreme Court over my head as a reason to vote for Obama. You know what? Let them overturn Roe v Wade. Let it go to the states. Let politicians no longer have the excuse that it's the law and they can't do anything. Make them accountable. Make the young women who have always had a choice fight for it like we did.

Call me a sore loser. Guess what? I am. I am not only sore, I'm angry, I'm frosted like a cake, I'm disgusted. Telling me I want to take my ball and go home because I can't have my way. You betcha. My ball (vote) isn't just going home with me it will be going to the polls in November and pulling the lever for Senator McCain.

CORRECTION: Scott, one of our very smart readers (who should be on the rules committee) pointed out that Senator Obama could not have taken his name of the ballot in Florida. My apologies.

Pro Choice

When this endless campaign began I was excited about our options for the Democratic nominee. I was proud that our choices included a woman, a Latino and an African-American. I liked that the stage didn't look like an all white country club.

I thought Bill Richardson would be great until I saw him debate. He was scatty Cathy.

I never really cared for John Edwards but I really like his wife.

I have great respect for Senator Biden and could never understand the lack of coverage on him. Had we done what he recommended in Iraq we would be out of the mess we're in now.

I was interested in Senator Dodd.

I was interested in Senator Obama because I really liked his speech at the Democratic convention in 2004 and his stance on Darfur.

Gravel & Kucinich - what can you say?

I wasn't sure about Senator Clinton. I thought she was too divisive.

The endless attacks on Senator Clinton has changed my mind. I have watched her handle more garbage than any other candidate has had chucked at him. She has proved to me that she can more than handle the job as Commander in Chief.

I am not voting for her because she is a woman. Nancy Pelosi is a woman and I cannot abide her. I believe that Senator Clinton is the most capable candidate in the race. We've got huge problems coming down the pike (peak oil) and whoever is our next President is going to have to make tough choices. Voting "present" will not fly.

The more I looked at Senator Obama the less I liked. He has run a dirty campaign. He has stolen speeches from his pal. He has unsavory connections. He went to a racist church for twenty years. He won't debate. His record in the Illinois State Senate is spotty at best. Community Organizer is not a qualification for President. His arrogance is bigger than his resume which is the only thing thinner than him.

The press has fallen in love with Senator Obama and have questioned him less than they did the reasons for the Iraq war.

So, we have been pretty clear on this blog that we do not support Obama.

The pro-Obama supporters come over here and try to hold my uterus above my head as a reason to vote for him should he get the nomination. (Odd visual) What they forget is that being Pro-Choice means that I get to choose whom I vote for and it won't be Obama. They tell me I'm not a Democrat. I was, but the persistent yapping telling me I can't be has forced me to become an Independent. No big tent here.

We're told that Senator Obama can win without us. Let's see him try.

The new "liberal" normal: Sexism is okay.

Keith Olbermann is a sick, morally depraved, imbecile. Friday he unleashed his bottomless pit of snot on Senator Clinton yet again. This time it was about Clinton's remarks regarding long campaigns and RFK. Not that it matters. If she had said "I shop at Safeway" K.O. would have unloaded - provided he'd gotten the cue from his Obama Overlords. Olbermann is a joke and hardly worth a remark - except to point out what has not merited a Special Comment from the Rancid One in the past 6 months:

Obama calling female reporters "sweetie"
Obama's 20 year stint in a church in which the pastor dry humps the pulpit.
David Schuter's "pimping out" Chelsea remark.
Chris "my legs are tingling" Matthews comment that Hillary Clinton is only a senator because her husband cheated. A remark both wildly sexist and utterly, indefensibly false.
An Obama aid calling the former First Lady a monster.
Obama's throwing the bird to a sitting U.S. Senator.

The list goes on. And on. Olbermann is a two bit errand boy. He doesn't care one bit about fairness. He, like Donna Brazzile on CNN, is a paid Obama shill. The FCC should strip MSNBC and CNN of their licenses.

The silence on the rampant sexism that has frothed forth from alleged liberals and the alleged media is both the single biggest intellectual crime of the decade (except maybe the censoring of anti-war voices in 2003)and an attack on civil society. From "Bros before Hoes" to the Hillary nutcracker, to the mocking of her welling up, to the glib manner in which male "reporters" have discussed her laugh, to...to...

Obama himself is very much at fault here and should be called out on it. As the sexism became louder and louder this year his campaign either encouraged it or did nothing to stop it. This is a failure of leadership from an alleged liberal. Conversely, every time anyone in Clinton's camp did anything that could be construed as racially insensitive Hillary Clinton put an end to it. (I do not include Ferarro here because what she said was not insensitive. It was a statement based in observable reality. Obama gets a lot of traction because he's black. As well he should. So what. Good for him. The idea of an African American President is appealing to fair minded people. However, BHO is not up to snuff -a Tom Cruise to Colin Powell's Cary Grant.)

What Obama, the DNC, and the compliant, brain dead media has done in trashing Clinton all year is reactionary. It is the opposite of progressive. 50% of the population has been degraded and insulted as a matter of course. As if it is normal. As if it is part and parcel of the Democratic Party's values. This year we HAD a chance in the Democratic Party to choose someone other than a white male and base that choice on merit. The DNC did not (though the people did ). The DNC has gamed the system to award the nomination to an unqualified minority candidate - thereby proving all the conservatives right. They gave Obama a hand out not a hand up.

Like her or not, support her or not, Hillary Clinton is qualified for the job of President. The "community organizer" from Chicago is not. (Now every time I see an Obamite defending his resume and using "community organizer" as a qualifier for President my eyes roll back in my head automatically. It's a Pavlovian response. I can't seem to help it. As far as I can tell - and I've looked - he organized some voter registration drives under the umbrella of a church. I help serve meals to the youth group at my church. Can I be President next?)

Clinton's qualifications never come up in the media. Why is this? I suspect that it would then force an airing of Obama's. His rump resume would then be seen for what it is: smoke, mirrors, and speeches. What does come up daily is her gender. Usually covertly. References to "tears" and "every man's first wife". This is terror on the part of "news" men. Pure terror. What Olbermann and the rest are reacting to is their own fear of castration. You see, it isn't that woman can't have some jobs once reserved for men - we have moved past that - it's that a woman can't have THAT job. If a woman gets THAT job then all the mediocre men who got promotions over more qualified women are on notice. The jig, as they say, will be up.

What Clinton represents by her presence is much more valuable to true progressives than what BHO represents. The reason is simple. She's more qualified than him. I could not write that sentence if Colin Powell was running against Clinton. Obama represents the worst failings of late 20th century liberalism: the invitation to view anyone who could show up and be a minority as "qualified." (Obama is the least qualified serious Presidential candidate in our history - yes, including Lincoln.) This is the opposite of what was intended by affirmative action which was an attempt to right the ship in the face of inbred anti-minority bias. It was not meant to elevate those with thin resumes to jobs that they would not have gotten otherwise.

There are thousands of reasons to vote for someone other than Obama in the fall. Electoral nullification is one. Juries do it. I won't vote for him for reasons that go to his character. But if women and men across the country vote for McCain to let the media elites know that what they've done will not stand - I will not be upset or surprised.

Do we control the body politic or does MSNBC?

Nullify Keith Olbermann.