Hillary Clinton: The Other White Meat. How The DNC ate the Clinton Campaign.

Something deeply disturbing has gone down in the Democratic Party over the course of the last year. 50% of the Democratic electorate is being thrown overboard by the elites. It is now evident that this was planned by numerous people high up in both party's power structures with the assent of some powerful media outlets. Not to mention George Soros. Below I list the evidence for my allegation that a fix was put in to stop Hilary Clinton. All of it is either MY inference or can be easily found with some basic google searches. This post goes to my suspicions. There may be rebuttals on all counts. Feel free to refute me on any point.

Obamites: get all your high handed rage ready. I am announcing here - upfront - that I am attempting to connect some dots with known material. This is not journalism. It does not pretend to be.

Obama makes no sense as a national candidate. This could change, I admit. I am not in the "he can't win" category. He could. (sans my vote) The coalition he has put together is simply weaker in most general election scenarios than Clinton's and yet the DNC and "liberal" media seem hell bent on anointing him. Since he admittedly has less experiecne than the stronger G.E. candidate, Clinton, why? His policy proposals are the same as Clinton's or weaker by Dems standards . He is, in fact, a divisive, figure now not a uniter. So why is the DNC and the media STILL determined to crown Obama? I believe there is more to the story - like the run up to the Iraq war - and am genuinely curious. Yes, I am furious about the sexism in the media abetted by the Obama camp. Yes, I resent how badly she has been treated. Yes, I am sad and disgusted it looks like she came in a close second. (except in the popular vote) And YES I think her campaign made some large mistakes. All of that plays a part - in my thinking. Still I wonder if a fix was not put in on Hillary early on. I am allowed to. The blog is 50% mine.

The 10 points below that indicate a plan for creating Obama and stopping Hillary Clinton and are worth deeper investigation:

1. Almost all Obama's legislative "accomplishments" came in his final year as a state senator. He had little to do with any of it aside from putting his name on the bill.

2. With heavy pressure from the Chicago owned Los Angeles Times a family court judge released the sealed divorce proceedings of BHO's main opponent for the U.S. Senate. This paved the way for an easy victory. Since the documents contained salacious information both parties in the divorce proceedings loudly protested the release of the documents. It was done anyway, flying in the face of ALL family court precedent. Why?

3. The poison pill in Florida GOP "paper trail" voting bill: Moving the primary up in violation of DNC rules became impossible for Democrats to vote against. They would have had to vote against a "paper trail" - after the 2000 thievery. Check mate.

4. Immediately following Florida's move Donna Brazille loudly pushed for the DNC to use the "nuclear" option and strip Florida of ALL it's delegates. Not the saner choice, made by the GOP, to remove half the delegation. Donna got her way. Florida, now denuded of power, was assumed to be a Clinton state. Turned out it was.

5. The same irrational, draconian punishment was meted out to Michigan, another Clinton stronghold. Nevertheless, fearing a Clinton rout in a large state, Obama chose to take his name off the ballot. He was not forced. 4 Democrats remained on the ballot. Clinton easily defeated them all.

6. Two of the largest Democratic political blogs suddenly became righteously anti - Clinton. Kos had an insurrection on its hands and without a murmur of concern allowed all Pro-Clinton writers to leave, though previously it supported moderate Democrats and Liberals. Americablog, run by the openly Gay man, John Avarosis, changed its tune even more abruptly. After years of viciously going after any and all homophobes, including Obama friend Donnie McClurkin, Americablog has surrendered its previous principled stance. Obama's homophobic fellow travellers are not an issue at Americablog. Why? Can I say a quid pro quo is behind this? No. Do I think there is more than meets the eye here? I certainly do.

7. The media drumbeat for Clinton to "get out" began right after Iowa. It was often loudest after she WON primaries. Bizarrely, the noise would peak after she had come from behind in Texas and soundly beat Obama in Ohio. It revved up again after she won PA handily -again after she came from behind to win in Indiana. There was no logic to the media's demands. The race was, and remains, close. The week of Obama's 41 point defeat in West Virgina Time magazine "declared" him the winner. Go figure.

8. Howard Dean has demanded adherence to the rules when it comes to Florida and Michigan while ignoring them when if comes to Iowa. According to the DNC's stated policy Iowa violated the rules by placing its caucus on Jan 3. Why did Dean ignore this violation?

9. Obama's well timed endorsements have been suspicious to me for a while. John Edwards' timing is most suspect. A solicitation email from an Edwards group was sent out the same day leading a logical observer to conclude that money had something to do with it. Elizabeth Edwards was not present when her husband endorsed Obama.

10. The Wright tapes were roundly ignored for months by all major media outlets. How is this possible? They were out there. Purchasable on the church's web site, for goodness sake. Yet, voters in fully 2/3 of the states had to decide BEFORE seeing them. Given the "gotcha" media environment - a logical person can only conclude that the media decided to ignore the tapes - until they no longer could.

Go on - let me have it. But please Obamatons, respond with rebuttals to one or all ten points above. Do not roundly scream "sour grapes!" and think you've won an argument. All points are verifiable or events I question based on my observations. Tell me I am on the right track or on the wrong one and why. We all did this same type of thinking out loud after Katherine Harris and Jeb Bush stole the 2000 election.

Elections are rough. I fault Clinton for not seeing how much the decked was stacked against her and responding more forcefully. Nevertheless, we have the right to ask questions about how all this came to pass.