Of course he should be censured. Why is there a debate?

CNN is asking: Should Bush be censured? Of course, the answer is yes. It is all much Worse than Watergate, as John Dean said. Here's why the censure won't take: Illegal wiretaps are the wrong issue. He did break the law, of course. The issue has yet to gain traction with "the public". I know this is no excuse. But I hate to see a good censure motion wasted.
Iraq cannot be ducked. The issue to introduce a censure motion on is WMD's - in particular the now clear body of evidence that the BushCheney/RiceRummy - (the hybrids from Hell) lied incessantly. They lied with a relentlessness that I almost respect. It takes effort to sling that amount of bullshit.

****Also - can we all STOP saying W is not making substantial changes in the west wing because he's stubborn or loyal. Ha! He is terrified. Those who have been there for the longest know where ALL the bodies are buried. He don't want them folk going nowhere.