When is Enough Enough?

Now, in my paper this was a blurb buried on the bottom of page four. In the New York Times this is the second story on their web page:

A White House official who once led the oil industry's fight against limits on greenhouse gases has repeatedly edited government climate reports in ways that play down links between such emissions and global warming, according to internal documents.

In handwritten notes on drafts of several reports issued in 2002 and 2003, the official, Philip A. Cooney, removed or adjusted descriptions of climate research that government scientists and their supervisors, including some senior Bush administration officials, had already approved. In many cases, the changes appeared in the final reports.

The dozens of changes, while sometimes as subtle as the insertion of the phrase "significant and fundamental" before the word "uncertainties," tend to produce an air of doubt about findings that most climate experts say are robust.

Mr. Cooney is chief of staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, the office that helps devise and promote administration policies on environmental issues.

Before going to the White House in 2001, he was the "climate team leader" and a lobbyist at the American Petroleum Institute, the largest trade group representing the interests of the oil industry. A lawyer with a bachelor's degree in economics, he has no scientific training.

Isn't that just super? How many lies and obfuscations are we going to allow this White House to get away with before we all storm the Bastille?

Let's see if this gets any more coverage than the Downing Street Memo.

Sure there's no Global Warming, especially when you, ONCE AGAIN, fix the intelligence to match your foregone conclusions.